I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Lucy (left), now an adult, told Squire she had been praying help would come
。关于这个话题，夫子提供了深入分析
Perplexity 推出 Perplexity Computer2。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读
Read the full story at The Verge.，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
We’re accepting limited sponsors for the elementary Blog. View our public analytics and learn more if you are interested.